DR. AZIM-UR-RAHIM KHAN MEO versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY
RR 3 and 5 [since removed] of the Sindh Civil Servants Act (XIV of 1973), section 2 (1) (a) of the Sindh Civil Servants (Regulating Ad hoc Appointments) Act (XIX of 1994), section 2 (2) ) Government Employees of Sindh (Probation, Certification and Sanity) Rules, 1975, R10 West Pakistan Secretariat (Section Officers) Service Rules, 1962 Handbook of Pakistan, Article 1212 (3) Ad hoc Appointment Scope Section Officers on the Interstate Conflict Seniority List (BS 17) Directly appointed by the Chief Minister of Sindh under the Sindh Public Service Commission (Functions) Rules 1990 R5, without the status of regular appointments of the Sindh Public Service Commission and not of ad hoc appointments. The applicant was appointed as a Section Officer at BPS 17 through Sindh Public Service. The Commission (Commission) was not handed over to the respondents in the year 1992 by direct use of powers under the appointment of the Provincial Chief Minister in 1991 in such positions. The applicants' requirements of the Sindh Public Service Commission (Rules) Rules 1990, (as it was then) were that the appointment of the defendant could not be considered for the purpose of determination of the elder and be treated as such. Should. Regularly required with ad hoc appointments. That the Sindh Civil Servants (Regulatory Ad hoc Appointments) Act, 1994, was enacted on 28 7 1994, and that the respondents regularly received the status of regular employees for the purposes of the said Act. Was. It may be contended that, in such circumstances, the respondents could not be granted the status of applicant as a senior despite the appointment in 1991, that is, by the applicants before Section 2 (1) (a) of the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973.
