Find a Lawyer

CH. ZAWWAR HUSSAIN WARRAICH versus MUHAMMAD AAMIR IQBAL

Sections (55 ()) and (63 (a)) affirming the election petition, the applicant's election affidavit, the Election Tribunal dismissed the election petition as there was no certification at the foot of the application, as well as the authenticity of the election petition. The affidavit was also filed and was affirmed by the Eighth Commissioner: Compliance with Section 55 (3) of the Representation People Act 1976 and Representation did not attract penalties under Section 63 (a) of the Public Act 1976 Went, the Supreme Court set aside the Election Tribunal's decision and obtained the remand for the election petition. Upset

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2015

• Dr. AZIM-UR-RAHIM KHAN MEO v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary 2015 PLC(CS) 1117
• FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION v. ALTAF HUSSAIN 2015 PLC(CS) 1130
• Mst. SUGHRA BEGUM v. QAISER PERVEZ 2015 SCMR 1142
• MANSOOR SHARIF HAMID v. SHAFIQUE REHMAN 2015 SCMR 1172
• FAROOQ GHEE AND OILS MILLS (PVT.) LTD. v. REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS, TRADE MARK REGISTRY 2015 SCMR 1230
• WELLA AKTINEESELLSCHAFT v. SHAMIM AKHTAR 2015 CLD 1231
• The FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN v. DELTA INNOVATIONS LTD. 2015 SCMR 1239
• Dr. PIR MUHAMMAD KHAN v. KHUDA BUKHSH 2015 SCMR 1243

All Supreme Court judgments of 2015 →

immigration advocates phone number from Lakki Marwat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes