Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

KHUSHI MUHAMMAD versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 bail, applicants' grants, those charged with murderous assault, only minor injuries to the attacker, while the serious suspect has already been extended on bail. ? Under the circumstances, permission to bail

1983 P Cr. LJ 2021

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

KHUSHI MUHAMMAD AND 2 OTHERS-Petitioners

Versus

THE STATE-Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1051/B of 1981, decided on 30th November, 1981.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) ---

--------S. 497-Bail, grant of-Petitioners, accused of murderous assault, causing only simple injuries to victim of assault whereas co-accused responsible for grievous injury already enlarged on bail-Question of vicarious liability of petitioners also requiring further inquiry Petitioners allowed bail, in circumstances.

Syed Murtaza Ali Zaidi for Petitioners.

Khalid Alvi for the State.

ORDER

This is an application for bail on behalf of Khushi Muhammad, Zahid Hussain and Abid Hussain, petitioners in a case under section 307/326/149/ 148, P. P. C. registered at Police Station Old Kotwali, Multan vide F. I. R. No. 603, dated 31st July, 1981.

2. The prosecution case is that the petitioners alongwith others in furtherance of their common intention launched murderous assault upon Hafiz Muhammad Ahmad Khan on 31st July, 1981 at 7-00 a. m. in the area of Shamasabad Colony, Multan.

So far as the petitioners are concerned, it is alleged that Khushi Muhammad and Abid Hussain armed with sotas and Zahid Hussain armed with a hatchet, caused simple injuries on the person of Hafiz. Muhammad Ahmad Khan, victim.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the co-accused namely, Din Muhammad, who was attributed grievous injury, has been allowed bail by this Court vide Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1035-B/ 81.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the State has opposed this application:

5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I find that the co-accused namely, Din Muhammad, has been allowed bail by this Court. The petitioners caused simple injuries to the victim. In these circumstances, the question of their vicarious liability needs further inquiry. The petitioners are allowed bail subject to their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner, Multan.

Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocates from Chaghi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.