Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUREED HUSSAIN versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 Bail, Applicant's Grant, Accused of Assassination Assault

1983 P Cr. LJ 2020

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

MUREED HUSSAIN AND 3 OTHERS-Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE-Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 902-B of 1982, decided on 17th July, 1982.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)-

-------S. 497-Bail, grant of-Petitioners, accused of murderous assault, in Jail for last 2 months--All injuries on person of victim of assault declared as simple except two which too not on vital part of body F. I. R. also lodged with delay of two days-Bail allowed, in circumstances.

Asif Saeed Khan Khosa for Petitioners.

Siddique Safdar for the State.

ORDER

This is an application for bail on behalf of Mureed Hussain, Allah Diwaya, Wa2ir son of Allah Ditta and Wazir son of Hassan, petitioners in a case under section 307/325/324/ 148/ 149, P. P. C. registered at Police Station Kala vide F. I. R. No. 22, dated 14th May, 1982.

2. The prosecution case is that the petitioners variously armed in furtherance of their common intention launched murderous assault upon Allah Ditta on 12th May, 1982 at degarwela in the area of Mauza Kot Butta of Police Station, Kala.

3. As for the petitioners, it has been alleged that Mureed Hussain petitioner No. 1 was armed with a hatchet and he gave one simple blow to the victim. As for Allah Diwaya, Wazir and Wazir petitioners 2 to 4 it has been alleged that they were armed with sotas and inflicted blows on the person of Allah Ditta in order to cause his death.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the injuries found on the person of the victim have not been declared dangerous to life and the grievous injuries were on a finger and right leg and as such, cannot be presumed that the petitioners wanted to kill the victim. As against this the learned State counsel has seriously opposed this appli cation.

5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I find that there is a delay of two days in loding the F. I. R. out of 19 injuries found on the person of the victim, 17 injuries have been declared simple and the remaining two injuries are also not on the vital part of the body. The p6ti tioners arc in Jail for the last two months.

6. For all these reasons I am inclined to allow bail to the petitioners subject to their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Assistant Com missioner/Duty Magistrate, Dera Ghazi Khan.

Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Daulat Pur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.