Section 324, 337A (I), 337F (I) Hashima, Injury, payment of Throne, presenting objections to the trader regarding the joint intention, stating that the trial court did not make the charge as per law. And the conviction recorded without the charges being altered, the law not supported nor the dispute about the misreading of evidence, was not impressive. And the trial court's conclusion was in accordance with the principles of the definition of evidence. A large number of individuals were named to the commission of the crime, but the role of the firearm injured by the testimony of an injured prosecutor was attributed only to one of the suspects who struck a dagger. Through the injured witness, the fugitive accused was assigned, the defendant's and the two prosecutor's witnesses assigned to any of the roles, except to name all the suspects, to the extent of injury, inconvenience and inconvenience. Was not done Their joint object was leveled against the accused and the fugitive, causing fracture in the tibia / cannabis, no one can be attributed because the witness himself was silent about the injury, the fugitive. The accused, who was allegedly hurt, was not charged. Injuries under Section 337A (1), 337L (2) and 337F (V), PPC, were proved by the accused A. After the violent attack on the complaining party and the formation of an unlawful assembly in the presentation of their common goods, they were held responsible for the criminal commission, which traveled further for the purpose of the unlawful assembly, dealing with them separately. Will go The persons covered under section (2) of Section 337N, PPC
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2014
