A. QUTUBUDDIN KHAN versus CHEC MILLWALA DREDGING CO. (PVT.) LIMITED
Sections 17, 30 and 33 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 158 Arbitration Award The objection to the arbitration award is not filed within the time prescribed by law 13 after the declaration of such award Less than a year ago, the issue of award-related issues was referred to a dispute of justice between the parties to an arbitrator who awarded the award on 6 12 1997, saying that the award was separated on 13 August 1998 with the consent of the parties. According to the order, the two parties agreed to nominate their arbitrators within 15 days. Do not Mazda, after giving notice to the arbitrator, the parties designated by the appeal of a, 11, 11, 1998, revealed that shows the evidence on the record by former party awards have been recorded by a single arbitrator. Holding an award under section 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (as determined by the appellant) cannot be declared unlawful, during the various stages of the arbitration proceeding, despite the service of notice to respond, Failure to happen when the sole arbitrator filed his award in court, a notice was issued to the respondent to file the objection and the respondent company failed to file the notice of confession. Article 158 of the Limitation Act 1908 objections were filed within 30 days from the date of service required and finally with a delay of 74 days, 13 years after the arbitration award, asking the parties to go again. The forum (the only High Court judge) will be a denial of justice according to which the appeal is allowed
