Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

STATE versus SAEED BUTT


The guarantees of Section 497 under Section 161 include the petitioner and the respondent in the CR PC injuring the defendant and such statements cannot be said in the circumstances of the respondents through the evidence of the witnesses. Usually not participating in this event. Investigation Officer's opinion, when the defendant was innocent, could not participate in the bail-out phase, it could be said that the section 497 bail statement under section 161 of the bail was canceled, pending the CRPC and Applicants involved in such injury are included. The testimony supported by the testimony of witnesses may not be said in the case of the respondent not participating in the incident, in the general opinion of the investigating officer, as in the case of the innocent respondent cannot be said to be at the bail-out stage. That the bail be canceled

1982 P Cr. L J 439

[Lahore]

Before Mazharul Haq; J

STATE-Petitioner

versus

SAEED BUTT-Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 4095-B of 1980, decided on 10th February, 1981.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)---

-- S. 497---Bail-Statements recorded under S. 161, Cr. P. C. involving petitioner and respondent in inflicting injury on deceased and such statements supported by evidence of witnesses---Respondent cannot in circumstances be said to have not taken part in incident---On general opinion of Investigating Officer, as to respon dent having been innocent respondent could not at bail stage be said to have not taken part in occurrence-Bail cancelled.

ORDER

On the last date of hearing notice was issued to Saeed Butt, respondent, who had been allowed bail by the Sessions Judge.

2. The occurrence in this case took place over some political dispute arising out of election. The petitioner was said to have inflicted a knife blow in the right flank of the deceased whereas Saeed Butt respondent gave a blow with a churri in the left flank of the deceased ; as a result of the two injuries Ikramul Haq died.

3. It is contended that the Investigating Agencies found the respondent innocent. On the general opinion of the investigating officers it cannot be said at this stage that the respondent did not take part in the occurrence. The statements recorded under section 161. Cr. P. C. involve the petitioner and the respondent. F. I. R. was made by Abdul Uhafoor. His statement is supported by P. Ws. Javed and Zafar Iqbal witnesses. I do not see any force in this petition and dismiss the same. Bail allowed to Saeed Butt respondent is cancel ted with the direction to the district authorities that he shall be detained in the district Jail till he is tried.

Bail cancelled

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocates from Digri lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.