Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD YAQOOB versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 426 (C) (1A) Applicants Appeal for their sentence under Section 302/34, PPC and sentenced to life imprisonment Punishment but there is nothing to hear about the immediate possibility of their appeal. Under the circumstances, the case of suspending sentence sentences

1982 P Cr. L J 440

[Lahore]

Before Rustam S. Sidhwa, J

MUHAMMAD YAQOOB AND ANorHER-Petitioners

versus

THE STATE-Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1 of 1930 in Criminal Appeal No. 226 of 1978, decided on 27th February, 1980.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)---

--- S. 426 (c) (1-A)-Sentence, supension of---Petitioners filing appeal against their conviction under S. 302/34, P. P. C. and sentence to undergo imprisonment for life but no immediate prospect existing of their appeal being heard---A case for suspension of sentences, held, made out, in circumstances.

M. A. Zafar for Petitioners.

Fazal Mobin Azad for the State.

ORDER

This is a petition under section 426, Cr. P. C. by Muhammad Yaqoob and Falahuddin, petitioners, for the suspension of their sentences pending the disposal of their appeal. They have been convicted under sections 302/34, P. P. C. and 325/34, P. P. C. and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and three years' rigorous imprisonment, each, respectively, apart from payment of fines in respect of both the offences.

2. This petition has been moved under clause (c) of subsection (1-A) of section 426, Cr. P. C. The petitioners were convicted on 22nd January, 1978. There is no immediate prospect of their appeal being heard. In these circumstances, the petitioners have made out a case for suspension of their sentences.

3. For the foregoing reasons, this petition is accepted and senten ces of Mohammad Yaqoob and Falahuddin, petitioners Nos. 1 and 2, are suspended and they are admitted to bail, subject to their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 20,000 (Rupees twenty thousand) each with two surities each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner, Multan.

Sentence suspended.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
family advocate from Kunri lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.