MUHAMMAD NADEEM ANWAR versus SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN
Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 13 (a) and 185 (3) General Clauses Act (X of 1897), Ordinance of Section 26 Companies (XLVII of 1984), Sections 230 (7), 234 (6) and 282 K National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), Sections 9, 10 and 11 of the Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 409 and 109 of the Endangered Species, one-time scope crime, but can be punished under two separate and separate rules. (Such as the bank's chief executive officer). The accused (s) allegedly obtained fraudulent credit facilities, bank records, fraudulent funds of the bank and his company and committing frauds against the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP). A High Court reference was also filed by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) before the criminal complaint and NAB reference was made on the same functions / errors. The accused was convicted by the accused for corruption and allegations of corruption under NAB reference. The elements of the criminal complaint filed by the ECP and NAB reference were the same. That when he was convicted in a NAB reference, he repeated similar acts and omissions in the criminal complaint against the provisions of the High Court affirmation of the Ordinance of Sections 230 (7), 234 (6) and 282K Companies. Cannot be prosecuted for Sections 9, 10 and 11 of the National Accountability Ordinance 1999, were different implementations of the law under which different procedures and forums were initiated to initiate proceedings, although both defendants were committed at the same time, However, the accused did so. Which proved to be a punishable offense under two separate and separate laws, namely one under the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 and the other Companies Ordinance, 1984.
