Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ ALIAS NAWAZA versus MEMBER JUDICIAL BOARD OF REVENUE

Article 199 The West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), the constitutional petition submitted by the High Court for interference, could not be made succinct (only) by the jurisdiction in the taxonomy because it was contentious to find the purity. Became. Only if it was based on a proper scrutiny of evidence where the findings of working places in the income tax categories were consistent but not based on the proper scrutiny of the evidence and the application of the law, the High Court was able to intervene. Is in its jurisdiction and may prevent it (in exercising its constitutional jurisdiction)

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2014

• MUHAMMAD NADEEM ANWAR v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN 2014 CLD 873
• ABDUL RAHEEM ZIARATWAL v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 SCMR 873
• SARFRAZ SALEEM v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 PLC(CS) 884
• F.M.Y. INDUSTRIES LTD. v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX 2014 SCMR 907
• ESSA ENGINEERING COMPANY PVT. LTD. v. PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LIMITED 2014 SCMR 922
• MUHAMMAD HANIF v. TARIQ MEHMOOD 2014 SCMR 941
• MUHAMMAD SIBTAIN v. Malik FAKHAR-UD-DIN 2014 SCMR 946
• Syed MUBASHIR RAZA JAFFRI v. EMPLOYEES OLD-AGE BENEFITS INSTITUTIONS (EOBI) 2014 SCMR 949

All Supreme Court judgments of 2014 →

best law firms from Muridkay lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes