Find a Lawyer

HAKIM ALI versus MUHAMMAD HANIF

Section 2 and 3, contempt of court, application for prerequisite The person affected by the violation of the court order had to show to the person who had been hurt the violation of the order of the court, when there was no contempt of court against the accused It has also been violated when action is initiated. There was no evidence to prove that the accused had violated a court order, it was not possible to understand that they had committed a contempt of court.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2014

• DAUD SHAH v. WARIS SHAH 2014 SCMR 852
• UNITED BANK LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 SCMR 856
• MUNAWAR IQBAL GONDAL v. Mrs. NASIRA IQBAL 2014 SCMR 860
• MAULA JAN v. State 2014 SCMR 862
• MUHAMMAD NADEEM ANWAR v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN 2014 CLD 873
• ABDUL RAHEEM ZIARATWAL v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 SCMR 873
• SARFRAZ SALEEM v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 PLC(CS) 884
• F.M.Y. INDUSTRIES LTD. v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX 2014 SCMR 907

All Supreme Court judgments of 2014 →

immigration advocate from Samundri lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes