Sections 302, 307 and 34 of the conviction, evidence of a joint intention to re-accuse the accused and co-accused were allegedly attacked by the complaining party, resulting in the killing of two people and injuring two victims, During the trial, the court sentenced the two to death. The accused, while two other accused were sentenced to life imprisonment, were acquitted by the trial court. The High Court acquitted all the accused and the accomplices, in addition to the oral evidence of the seventeen (17) witnesses, the documentary evidence was brought to the record by the prosecution witnessing the testimony of two (important) prosecution witnesses. Accordingly, it is said to confirm and confirm the case that the two eyewitnesses remained consistent and trustworthy during their investigation in the Chief, and even during the lengthy trial, their testimony was scattered without both. The evidence stated that witnesses were enrolled after more than five years. Thus, the evidence used by a particular accused, etc. No significant difference in the nature of lovers had no material result of the thief lubricating their evidence. In addition, in those situations when the average memory and the most intelligent person was not expected to be a firearms expert, which can accurately disclose the nature of the weapons used in the crime, it is also the case. Five years later, the fact that witnesses survived the catastrophic injuries during both incidents was fully established on record and in such cases, their evidence could not be denied or denied by the High Court. Was because its n
