GHULAM ALI versus ALI NAWAZ KHAN

A. XVII, r 3 The suit contends that the trial court erred in prosecuting the date on which the applicant's evidence was sealed, used in Rule 3 of XVII, CPC. Not accurate in terms of words.

1981 C L C 1147

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Ilyas, J

Mian GHULAM ALI‑Petitioner

versus

ALI NAWAZ KHAN‑Respondent

Civil Revision No. 584‑D of 1981, decided on 23rd May, 1981.

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑--------

------O. XVII, r. 3‑Suit‑Contention that trial Court committed an illegality in deciding suit on same date on which evidence of petitioner closed, held, not correct in view of word 'forthwith' used in r. 3 of O. XVII, C. P. C.

Maulvi Abdul Aziz Khan v. Mst. Shah Jahan Begum and 2 others P L D 1971 S C 434 fol.

Ashiq Husain Mal for Petitioner.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer

Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad

advocate from Jamrud Road lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes

👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.

Lawyers Directory Listing

Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team