FATEH MUHAMMAD versus KHUSHHAL MUHAMMAD

The case of the respondents of section 12 (2) former effect is still pending when sub-section (2) has been inserted in section 12 in section 12, which can be amended by amending the rule in section 12, CPC which Due to which the parties are suffering and the defendants declare the court harmful. Previous Impact to Edit [Constitution Interpretation]

1981 C L C 1130

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Ilyas, J

FATEH MUHAMMAD‑Petitioner

versus

KHUSHHAL MUHAMMAD‑Respondent

Civil Revision No. 447 of 1981, decided on 25th April 1981.

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑--------

-----S. 12(2)‑Retrospective effect‑Respondent's suit still pending when subsection (2) inserted in S. 12 by way of amendment giving retrospective operation to procedural amendment in S. 12, C. P. C. causing inconvenience to parties and detrimental to respondent-- Court not inclined to give retrospective effect to amendment.‑[Inter pretation of statutes].

Adnan Afzal v. Capt. Sher Afzal P L D 1969 S C 187 rel.

Ch. Safdar Ali v. Malik Ikram Elahi and another 1969 S C M R 166 ref.

Ch. Muhammad Saeed‑II for Petitioner.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer

Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad

best law firms from Jehlum lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes

👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.

Lawyers Directory Listing

Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team