Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

LAI versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Bail [Murder Case] Applicants are not named in the FIR but the first time the complainant named them in their supplemental statement more than 3 months after the local police Applicants were found innocent during the investigation but were convicted. Further investigation by the Range Investigation Team and the Provincial Applicants' Provincial Applicants Provincial Crime Branch Case is currently under investigation, in the circumstances

1981 P Cr. L J 1124

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Rafiq Tarar, J

LAL AND 3 OTHERS-Petitioners

Versus

THE STATE-----Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1343-B of 1981, decided on 7th July, 1981.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)---

-----S. 497-Bail----[Murder-case] --- Petitioners not named in F. I. R. but for first time complainant named them as accused per sons in his supplementary statement more than 3 months after occurrence-Petitioners found innocent during investigation by local Police but held guilty by Range Investigation Team and issue cur rently under investigation' by Provincial Crime Branch-Case of petitioners, held, requires further inquiry-Bail confirmed, in circum stances.

Mian Munawwar Hussain and Ch. Zia-ud-Din for Petitioners.

Shah Nawaz for the State.

Muhammad Anwaar Ahmad Khan for the Complainant.

ORDER

Lal, Ramzan, Sher Khan and Wali Dad petitioners who are involved in a murder case, have moved this petition for bail. Initially the case was registered under section 364, P. P. C. on the report of Bahadur Khan wherein he alleged that he bad a suspicion that his brother Mubarik Khan bad been done away with by Naseer alias Guddi and Bashir etc. Later on, dead body of Mubarik Khan was recovered at the instance of Naseer aforementioned and section 302, P. P. C. was also added. The petitioners are not named in the F. I. R. It is admitted that for the first time the complainant named them as accused persons in his supplementary statement recorded more than three months after the occurrence. There is also no dispute that the petitioners were found innocent during the investigation by the local police. They were, however, found guilty by the Range Inves tigation Team, Sargodha. Thereafter, the investigation was entrusted to Barkat Ali Sub-Inspector, Crimes Branch, Lahore. He states that he agreed with the report of the local police and now the investigation has again been transferred to Ch. Sultan Ahmad, D. S. P., Crimes Branch, Lahore. In the circumstances, I am of the view that the case of the petitioners requires further inquiry. The interim bail allowed to them is, therefore, confirmed. They have been directed to join the investigation if and when required.

Bail confirmed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of advocates from Kandhkot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.