Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD SIBTAIN SHAH versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 Bail (murder case) Applicant is one of 10 accused, one of whom was shot by a co-accused while the other joined the petitioner suffering from pulmonary tuberculosis. And better treatment can be done with the permission of the applicant at the prison hospital. Guaranteed, in the circumstances

1981 P Cr. L J 1103

[Lahore]

Before Abdul Shakurul Salam, J

MUHAMMAD SIBTAIN SHAH-Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE-Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3596-B of 1980, decided on 3rd November 1980.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)------

-- S. 497-Bail-[Murder-case] - Petitioner alleged to be one of 10 accused amongst whom one co-accused opened fire while others joined him-Petitioner- suffering from pulmonary tuberculosis and could better be treated privately than in Jail hospital-Petitioner allowed bail, in circumstances.

Kaisar Mustafa and another v. The State 1970 P Cr. L J 1128 and Haji Mir Afrab v. The State 1979 S C M R 320 rel.

Haji Rahimullah v. The State and another 1970 S C M R 514 distingu ished. ,

Allah Wasaya Malik for Petitioner.

Abdul Wahab for the State.

ORDER

The petitioner is involved alongwith 9 others in a case registered against him under sections 302/307/148/149/109, P. P. C. on 12thFebruary, 1980. Soon thereafter, he was arrested and since then he is in Jail. He applied for bail on medical ground and a certificate from the Medical Superintendent, D. H. Q. Hospital, Sargodha is to the effect that "His X-ray shows infiltration of Right Apex. His E. S. R. of Mood is 36. He can be treated effectively in Jail Hospital."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to Kaisar Mustafa and another v. The Slate (1970 P Cr. L J 1128) and Haji Mir Aftab v. The State (1979 S C M R 320) to contend that the petitioner is entitled to bail on medical ground.

3. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the bail application and has referred to Haji Rahimullah v. The State and another (1970 S C M R 514) relied upon by the learned Sessions Judge. This is distinguishable on facts.

4. The petitioner is said to be one of the ten accused from amongst whom Ghulam Abbas opened the fire and the others joined him. No doubt the Medical Superintendent has stated that the petitioner can be treated effectively in Jail Hospital but it is obvious that the petitioner who is suffering from the Pulmonary Tuberculosis, can better be treated privately. The case of the petitioner is covered by the two authorities referred to by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In all the circum stances of the case, the petitioner is allowed bail in the sum of Rs. 10,000 (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner, Mianwali.

Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Sanghi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.