Section 9 (b) Definition of Evidence The benefit of the doubt was influenced by the fact that the trial court did not offer any cross-examination by the accused and the prosecution's testimony and the complainant's testimony went to the non-controversial trial court. However, both were lost on the fact that the prosecution witnesses, who were police officers, were not examined on the same date, but were examined on different dates. And that both the prosecution's witnesses were investigated in the absence of the accused's lawyer, who said that his case was presented at the time of the trial of the prosecution witnesses, the trial court, Will take into account all the issues of In arriving at this conclusion, whether a fact is proved or not. Because the proof of a fact depends on the probability of its existence. And not on the accuracy of the statement that a copy of the alleged daily newspaper which proves that the complaining party was actually patrolling day by day, was not presented in evidence despite the fact that no one was Was not presented as a witness or counselor. During the patrol, the police party received spy reports about the sale of marijuana to the accused, saying that the prosecutor explained that there was no private person available at the recovery site because of the heat, which was apparently a lame excuse, which made a conscious mind. Did not appeal. Because the recovery site was in the middle of the city and the alleged recovery was done at 1am - 30 minutes, which was the main business location. And it went beyond the notion that no private person was available at the alleged rehabilitation site 8 days after his recovery.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
