Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

AHMAD YAR versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM


Section 15 cleansing is clearly different from displaying a transaction in a device, but the method adopted to defeat the right to the hypothetical sentiment shows evidence that the former was able to defeat the right to stability. Built between relationships, Wendy's and Seller are the closest relationships. To defeat pre-emptive rights, adopt a valid instrument and institutional suit [words and phrases] by separating the piece of land by improving your case legally.

1981 C L C 527

[Lahore]

Before Manzoor Hussain Sial, J

AHMAD YAR AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners

Versus

MUHAMMAD ASLAM‑Respondent.

Civil Revision No. 1837‑D of 1980, heard on 2nd March, 1981s

(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑

S. 102(b) [as amended by Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Ordinance (X of 1980)]‑Second appeal‑Jurisdiction‑Regular Second Appeal‑Lies only when jurisdictional value of subject‑matter exceeds Rs, 50,000‑Value of suit being less than Rs. 50,000, appeal held, not maintainable nevertheless treated as revision and disposed of accord ingly.‑[Second appeal‑Revision (civil)].

(b) Mubammadan Law‑

Gift‑Possession, delivery of‑Strangers to transaction of gift‑ Cannot assail validity of transaction on ground of possession having not been delivered to donee. Donee as well as donor both stating possession of gifted property having been delivered to donees, pre emptor, held, devoid of locus standi to challenge gift on ground of non‑delivery of possession.

Fazal Ahmad v. Mst. Rakhi P L D 1958 Lah. 218 and Dost Muhammad Khan v. Imam Bakhsh P L D 1971 Pesh. 150 ref.

(c) Punjab Preemption Act (I of 1913)‑

S. 15‑Pre‑emption ‑ "Device" markedly different from "dis guise"‑Appearance of transaction in a "device"‑‑Not fictitious but a mode adopted to defeat right of pre‑emption‑‑Evidence showing transaction to be one made between close relations to defeat right of pre‑emption‑Vendees and vendor being close relations, held, adopted a valid device to defeat right of pre‑emption and improved their status by legitimate method by alienation of a piece of land before institution of suit.‑[Words and phrases].

Rana Abdul Rahim for Petitioner.

Ch. Mashtaq Ahmad Khan for Respondent.

Date of hearing : 2nd March, 1981.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Shakargarh lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.