Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD ISMAIL versus JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, JHANG


Section 10 (2) requires the presence of the parties to the agreement, to affect the settlement or reconciliation, to provide an opportunity to meet with each other and to explore the possibility of the departure of the agreement, in the case that follows. More opportunities can be placed and there will be no departure. The amount of failure by the court to comply with the required provinces

1981 C L C 243

[Lahore]

Before Zakiuddin Pal, J

Haji MUHAMMAD ISMAIL‑Petitioner

versus

JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, JHANG AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Writ Petition No. 902 of 1980, decides) on 4t1October, 1980.

(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)----

_‑ O. X, r. 2‑Oral examination o party by Court‑‑Framing of issues‑ Party called upon by Court to make better statement to enable Court to frame issues properly but failing to appeal‑Inference, held, can be drawn as to such party being not interested in rendering assistance in framing of correct issues‑West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), S. 10(4).

Sadiq All v. Mst. Bashir Bibi and another 1979 C L C 647 ; Abdur Rauf N. Mst. Anwar Khatoon P L D 1976 Lab. 1598 ; Lai v. Mst. Inayat Bibi and another P L D 1975 Muhammad Ishaque v. Ch. Ahsan Ahmad, Judge Family Court P L D Lab. 1118 ; Muhammad Sadiq Hussain v. Mst. khurshid Fatima and another 1978 S C M R 130 and Fl.‑Lt. Anwar‑ul‑Hassan ;;iddiqui v. Judge Family Court No. III, Karachi and 2 others P L D 1980 Kar 477 ref.

(b) West Pakistan Family Court Act (XXXV of 1964)‑‑

‑‑ S. 10(2)‑Reconciliation‑Presence of parties, held, necessary for effecting compromise or reconciliation by affording them opportunity to meet each other and to explore possibility of reconciliation ‑‑‑Departure, held further. can be made in given circumstances of a case and such departure would not amount to failure on part of Court to comply with mandatory provinces.

Khalid Mahmood Syed v. Qazi Abbas Bokhari, Judge, Family Court, ,ahore anti .,r rh, , P 1 D 1979 Lab. 217 ref.

(c) West Pakistan Family Courts Acts (XXXV of 1964)‑

‑‑‑‑ S. 10(2)‑Family Court‑‑‑Personal attendance of a party in family Court, held, not indispensable and in given circumstances of a case can be dispensed with.

(d) West Pakistan Family Courts Art (XXXV of 1964)‑

‑‑‑ S. 10(2)(3)‑‑Irregularity‑Provision, of law under S. 10(2)(3) of Act though mandatory and to be followed in its true spirit, yet violation thereof only an irregularity inviting penalty.

(e) West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964)‑

‑‑‑‑‑ S. 10(2)(3)‑Ex parte decree‑Pre‑trial stage‑No provision of Act, held, enables Family Court to pass ex parte decree in case of failure of a party to appear at pre‑trial stage‑[Decree].

Pervaiz Akhtar for Petitioner.

S. Liqa Haider Zaidi for Respondent No. 2.

Date of hearing : 27th September, 1980.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocate from Chak Sheza lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.