BULAND KHAN versus CHIRAGH DIN

Sections 96, 100 and 115 (1) Appellate Respondents Respond to Additional District Judge Additional Judge District Judge's Revision Amendment challenging the trial court's challenging order and dismissing the case. Is not, in the original jurisdiction, such an order against a regular first appeal, not qualified, not the first appeal, which was further held, the second appeal under section 115 (4) and the second revision Can't be as satisfying as [Appeal (Civil) Revision (Civil)]

1981CLC249

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Ilyas, J

BULAND KHAN‑Appellant

versus

CHIRAGH DIN AND 3 OTHERS‑Respondents

Regular First Appeal No. 127 of 1980, decided on 30th June, 1980.

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑

‑‑ Ss. 96, 100 & 115(1)‑Appeal‑Revision‑Respondent challenging order of trial Court in revision before Additional District Judge Additional 'District Judge accepting revision and dismissing suit Such order being passed in revisional jurisdiction and not in original jurisdiction, Regular First Appeal, against such order, held, not competent‑First Appeal, held further, could not be treated as Second appeal and second revision under subsection (4) of S. 115 also not entertainable.‑[Appeal (civil)‑Revision (civil)].

Syed Faqir Hussain for Appellant.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer

Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad

pakistani advocates Bhuawana lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes

👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.

Lawyers Directory Listing

Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team