Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 324/34 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 17 (3) Guarantee, denial of offense under the Prohibited Clause of Section 497 PC, Shortly after the incident, the motorcycle was arrested in the presence of witnesses with an unlicensed gun, nothing was on record to show that the complainant was a liar in this case. As there is no reason for the accused and others involved, no documentary evidence was brought on record to show that. That there was a family dispute between the parties, mere verbal words by the defense were not enough to show that the accused was falsely involved in the case, no evidence of any witness was recorded, therefore, there The first aspect is that it can be believed that the accused was involved in the commission of a crime punishable under section 17 (3) under the provisions of the Property (Enforcement Act) Ordinance, 1979, which had the MPO on the right and left. Foot tuition or 14 years imprisonment, so the case falls under the prohibition clause of section 497 CC, PC Bell was denied in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
