The testimony of the provisions of Sections 324 and 504, the benefit of the doubt, the complainant was not endorsed by the other eyewitness who was his cousin. I was involved in the material contradictions in the evidence made the prosecution's version seriously suspicious The unexpected delay of 2/3 days in recording the statements of witnesses by the Investigation Officer also adversely affected their authenticity. The prosecution's witnesses did not agree on the location and whereabouts of the suspect. The crime scene and the rifle were neither sealed nor a ballistic expert sent to find out whether the same was used in the commission of the crime, the suspect was acquitted on suspicion of the circumstances. Was done.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
