Sections 42 and 54 of the University of Act (XXV of 1972), Sections 51 and 52 of the Declaration and Permanent Decree, have been obtained by the University for the termination of the plaintiff ff Degree, by tampering with the registration of the results. Being a \ Real Reality Registrar \ B Master, the master register was kept under the lock and key of the Registrar in high security, while the Result Register \ A \ was always in the office all day, with the mark sheets in the register \ B. And issue the degree in which 00 numbers are displayed was obtained by the plaintiff in all three papers. While the register \ A \ obtained 50.50, through it, and obtained 40. The tampering was clearly visible in the numbers listed in the Register \ A in which the plaintiff was issued a degree claim because it did not challenge the tampering in Register \ A to show the response notice. The result, published by the University and the University, showing that the University failed to detect fraud, forgery, tampering, or manipulation of its records, could not only validate and improve its record, but also Consequently, in addition to the cancellation, award, degree or certification of the plaintiff, the degree to which the plaintiff's degree was not fraudulent in criminal proceedings and retaliation proceedings, but on the basis of tampering and manipulation. Was obtained using sources. The super structure built on it will fall to the ground The plaintiff cannot claim any foundation loss in such degree. The plaintiff was entitled to such tampering and not to the University by the University authorities.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
