Find a Lawyer

AZIZ-UR-REHMAN CHAUDHRY versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, RAWALPINDI

Section 2A and 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Service Constitutional Petition Approved by the Tribunal Process Petition Judge 6 retired on 2003 and filed an appeal before the Service Tribunal in 2004, which allowed 26 6 was given on 2006. Based on the decisions passed by the Supreme Court, according to Mohammad Idris reported as Mohammad PLN 2006 SC 602 and PLD 2007 SC 681, the decision passed by the Service Tribunal on this basis Denied that the decision was passed in favor of the petition. The service tribunal had ratified the affidavit, there was no observation in the case of Mohammad Mubin in our salutation or in the case of Mohammad Idrees that even after the decision of such decisions by the Supreme Court, the decision of the service tribunal was delayed. If not suspended despite availability, authorities will automatically stand if any of the Supreme Court rulings fail to identify any of these, which can also be attributed to a dispute that could support the authorities' dispute. Is. The High Court noted with great concern how effective the treatment provided to the public servant under the Service Tribunals Act 1973 was, as it did not make any mistake, was unfairly treated with the applicant but only The reason that the forum provided it to redress its grievances is that it has no authority to implement its own decision, which, as a class, allows government employees to accept orders passed in their favor. Implementation suffers daily. Empowering service law to enforce their own decisions best advocate from Kharian lawyer