Section 2 302 (b) Re-review of Qatil-Um Dalil The benefit of the doubt was that the deceased husband / deceased, and sentenced to life imprisonment for not being the source of the light of the witnesses near the deceased. Around 30:30 pm, a valid incident took place inside the house, but no light source was shown or shown anywhere on the record. The prosecution witnesses were closely linked to the victim. And in fact the witnesses were witnesses who failed to bring anything on record to establish the reason for their availability near the deceased at the time of the incident. Such related witnesses failed to obtain any free association. Because there was no independent evidence. The alleged rope retrieval was legally contradictory Medical evidence has gone much further, criticizing eye witnesses Post-mortem examination report The death of a doctor by injuries and death by eye witnesses is quite suspicious. It has been reported that the contents of the abdomen (pronounced) have lied to witnesses at the time of the incident. It showed that no poison or intoxicant was found inside the victim's body, which contradicted the eyewitness testimony. Prosecutors reasonably failed to prove their case against the accused above and below the courts. The source was listed and the accused was convicted and she was acquitted. Appeal was allowed under the extension of the benefit of the doubt
