ELAHI BAKHSH THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL
Section Q Canons of Evidence (Sun 1984) 1984 1984) 101010 Pre-Captured Rights A case has been filed by the plaintiffs in exchange for their right to sovereignty by the Exchange Deadline registered between the S&M and the defendants. I was charged that the conversion of the underground land was in fact a sale and since such an empty case was declared a burden of legality to the plaintiffs, it was to prove that the transaction in question was a sale and not an exchange. Tho S and M have stated in their evidence in court that their dealings with the defendants were a sale and that S&M was like that. Not exchanging oral statements of is different in terms of the process that they filed with the defendants on the oral statement of a party to the instrument in which their terms vary or differ in their terms. Could not be entered into evidence. Therefore, Law and Evidence, 103 of 1984), therefore, S & M's oral statements were inadmissible in evidence, according to which the appeal was allowed and the plaintiff's case was dismissed.
