Find a Lawyer

HUSSAIN BAKHSH versus STATE

Section 497 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 365 bail, the complainant's two daughters were allegedly abducted from his house and the complainant's unmarried daughter happily accompanied a co-accused. On the basis of which he was married, the trial court granted bail before his arrest. The complainant's second daughter declared the accused completely involved in his statements under Sections 161 and 164, CCP C accused them of accusing Xena of being supported by the Chemical Examiner Family Honor report. After being involved in the case, the three-day delay in filing an FIR was not fatal to the prosecution's case, as in those cases, people try to recover their victims for the first time and refrain from going to the police station. , There was considerable material material in the record against them. The accused Bell was denied the circumstances under the circumstances \ r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• MUHAMMAD AKHTAR v. State 2009 YLR 1023
• MEHRAN DISTRIBUTORS through Proprietor v. UNITED BANK LTD. Through Engineering Division, Karachi 2009 YLR 1024
• H&B, GENERAL TRADING COMPANY through Director v. INTERNATIONAL MARKETING COMPANY through Proprietor 2009 CLD 1028
• Mrs. FATIMA v. ORIENT TRAVELS (PVT.) LTD. Through Chief Executive Tenant 2009 MLD 1033
• MASTER TILES AND CERAMIC INDUSTRIES LTD. through Executive for International Business v. FEDERATON OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Ports and Shipping, Islamabad 2009 CLC 1036
• MUHAMMAD HASSAN v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SUKKUR 2009 YLR 1036
• MUHAMMAD YOUSUF v. CHAIRMAN, KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION 2009 YLR 1038
• UMAIR v. State 2009 YLR 1041

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

jobs for advocates from Chowk Maitla lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes