MRS. FATIMA versus ORIENT TRAVELS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE TENANT
Sections 2 (1) and 15 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Tenants' Estimation of Tenants in the Payment of Monthly Rent Non-payment of Water and Conservation charges Landlord's application for eviction The controller and the lower appellate court affirmed the dismissal. The rent for the month of July 5 was paid and payable on 1998, 1998 and could be paid to the landlord by 20 7 1998, while the same amount was fixed by money order as on 25 default 1998 date. Provided that under this law such default was irrespective. In relation to the rental rate the dispute was obligated to pay the tenant as agreed under the tenancy agreement No evidence was presented by the tenant to show that the money order Prior to the lease, there was an attempt by the landlord to pay the rent. Both the courts did not properly consider such aspect of the matter and dismissed the dismissed persons, as set out in the relevant law along with the agreement. Ignoring the tenancy agreement available on record, both the courts below failed to exercise the jurisdiction they had established, and the written agreement between the parties, according to the law, did not show that the landlords had infringed upon them. Responsible for water saving and payment of responsibility. Any evidence to the contrary, it was the tenant's duty to pay such costs. The landlord did not present any such bill to the rent controller
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Shahpur Chakar lawyer