A. VIII, R2 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 188, 226 and 227 Power of Attorney Act (VII of 1892), Section 2 suit for recovery of plaintiff's failure to perform its assigned work to the plaintiff As stated in the General Power of Attorney. Plaintiff's services were obtained as Engineer / Architect and Building Designer for the Sports Complex but the Plaintiff failed to produce evidence in any document, drawing, plan, design and proof of its approval that Sports Complex's Until the day of the cancellation of the General Power of Attorney to show performance, the General Power of Attorney assigned to the function where the plaintiff failed to prove that the defendant's money was due to the defendant, as such In the trial, the dismissal was justified in the evidence that the plaintiff had clearly stated. His claim was completely false, the evidence on record proved that the defendant had failed to perform the duties assigned to him by the defendant in General Power. The plaintiff's attorney, in the circumstances, canceled the contract to cancel the same video and notified all concerned, including the plaintiff. And the payment of the post-dated check was also stopped by the plaintiff. It was established to the plaintiff that he did not issue a post-dated check to the plaintiff against payment of any part of his consulting fee and he was not withdrawn. , Sayed Check was delivered to the claimant by the plaintiff. In view of the employment, but the plaintiff failed to perform the assignment assigned to him, on the contrary he abused his authority, acting contrary to the plaintiff's interest, saying
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
