Find a Lawyer

ALI HASSAN versus STATE

Sections 6 (2) (e), 19 (12) and 25 were punishable by absence, two options were available in the law for the person convicted in the absence. He could appeal from the trial court under section 19 (12) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 by proving that he is not a fugitive and also to file an application under section 19 (12) of the Act under section 25 of the said Act. Are. The appeal under section 25 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 was not a prerequisite for filing an appeal. The powers of the appellate court were wider than the powers of the trial court in setting aside the sentence in the absentee trial court. In his presence, the accused will be prosecuted. While the appellate court may remand the case to the trial court for fresh trial after dismissing the sentence, it can be dismissed on good grounds, if any case is suitable for merit. If a person is convicted, it would be meaningless to stand trial. The absentee was entitled to be acquitted of merit; he could not be forced to go through trial under Section 25 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. No need to suggest that a person should be sentenced in absentia. Had been heard and could not have filed the appeal without the first application. Section 19 (12) of the said Act family advocate from Kundina lawyer