ALI GHULAM LAGHARI versus CHAUDHARY MUHAMMAD ASLAM GILL
Sections 3 (i), (ii), 4, 6 and 9 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 34 of the Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Sections 417, 250 and 265K of the appellant / Complainant Their appeal did not indicate their legal status under the Unlawful Disposition Act, 2005, in the area where they were allegedly expelled from the jurisdiction of the unlawful estate, Appeals can only be made by the owner or occupier who was apparently evicted without legal authority, indicating that the accused was acting in compliance. The government's scheme and it had neither seized the land of legal authority nor removed the appeal from the land court, and the court was empowered to acquit the accused at any stage after the prosecution and the trial of the accused. It is considered that since the accused is unlikely to be convicted of a crime. Neither the appellants were the owners or occupants of the land under consideration, nor were they expelled, nor were the defendants occupying the land, the appellants could not. Keep the application under the Unlawful Dispossession Act, 2005, the trial court, having acquitted the accused, made no mistake and correctly approved the invalid order.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
