HAMEED A. HAROON versus YOUSUF A. HAROON
Sections 39, 42 and 54 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O xxxxx, Rr 1 and 2 Interim injunction, third party interest in grant of dedicated property The plaintiff claimed that the terms of dedication in the use of the property in the defendant's estate Are violating. Legally the lease of the property had expired and the third party participated by paying the money for the lease restoration. The third party had spent considerable money on the trust property, thus the property was not worth the deduction. To be employed for the purpose because in view of the contribution made by the third party considered in the dedication merit petition, the High Court refused to grant the plaintiff's order against the defendants, the requests were dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Daulat Pur lawyer
