Section 2 302/34 ??? Appreciation of Evidence Section Comp Section15, CRPC, in its statement, the complainant did not name a person, nor did he present to the court that he could produce evidence because his Although a warrant for arrest was issued for the arrest warrant, their prosecution witness was a witness who was present at the scene along with others, even in his affidavit, did not name any person in his statement under section 161, ID. In the parade, the PCC witness excluded the accused and, in his cross-examination, stated that he had made his statement under Section 161, Cr. There was no explanation of the accused (hulyh). And that the two suspects were handcuffed at the time of identification, keeping in mind that it was a nighttime incident when it was completely dark and the witness said in cross-examination that the suspects were with 15 dummy. Both the suspects were handcuffed, the identification parade would not be considered properly conducted as the accused could easily be exposed to wrongdoing situations, it was said by the witness who was in the identity of the accused. K was one of 3 witnesses and who stated that he identified the suspect as he did. Revolver identified the prosecution witness at his temple, who was an eyewitness and was sitting in the car at the time of the incident, and presented it to the counselor. In his cross-examination it was stated that he had named the accused in his statement under Section 161, noting that the complainant in his statement under Section 154, CCP Did not name the culprit, that is
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
