Sections 115 and 151 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), removal of the amendment in section 5 default, and dismissal of the revocation request by the applicant who was an 81-year-old woman for illegal prosecution. Went and filed an application for illegal action. On the one hand, the lawyer representing the applicant for the dismissal and reinstatement of the dismissal application had expired and after his death neither the applicant had any information about the date of the hearing nor A notice of notice has been sent to the applicant personally in court. Applicant's vigilance backed him up as his son when he learned of the applicant's lawyer's review and removal of his death, and filed a restitution within six days from the date of his knowledge, In the circumstances, the applicant had a reasonable reason for needing to interfere with the incomplete order as the parties were entitled to the privileges earned under the immovable order which rejected the amendment in the default and illegal prosecution. Was placed, set aside, and the amendment request has been restored to its original condition subject to payment of costs Was.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
