MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus VTH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CENTRAL) KARACHI
Sections 15 (2) (ii) and 21 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Removal of a tenant based on default in payment of tenants, respondents who were the legal heirs of the original landlord withdrew against the tenant. Were applying for interest which was in the interest of interest. Applicants on the basis of default in paying rent for shops in question for the relevant period have claimed that the tenants had paid rent to the landlord in cash, but the landlord had filed the landlord. Dismisses the application, stating that in the past, landlords / respondents had foreseen rent in the interests of the proponents, after considering the available evidence on the appellate authority's record on appeal. It was found that the applicant was unwilling to pay the foregoing rent in interest and Was set aside. The rent controller's order and the dismissal of the applicants were ordered that the applicants / tenants have filed constituencies in the interest of the applicants against the decision of the appellate authority predecessor as a result of the questions of the appellate appellate authority. No evidence could be presented either verbal or documentary to prove that the disputed rent payment was made by the applicants / proprietors in default of payment of rent. Of the controversial outlets, both the facts and the law were correct, which did not require interference, in the absence of a misrepresentation of evidence in the appellate authority's order, which was exercised by the High Court in exercising its constitutional jurisdiction. The order should not be interfered with
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
