In the case of the plaintiff's declaration and damages against the defendant in section 42 it was stated that the defendants acted in good faith, which is why the other defendants agreed to pass unlawful orders against the plaintiff. What prevented him from paying his salary for about 33 months, and his image and credibility in the general public were stained to prove that the defendant inspected himself and three witnesses, but the record All the evidence did not show any of the defendants' motions on which his name may be named. And his salary is enough to harass the plaintiff because of his closure. In order to obtain an injunction for damages, the plaintiff had to prove it through solid evidence. Moreover, the actions of these defendants were unsafe and collective in order to cause fame or financial loss. Secondly, because of these actions, such damages were actually suffered by the plaintiff and required that the equitable adjudicator failed to produce any evidence to prove that, nothing on record. Was that the entire salary was withheld due to any act. For the defendants for whom the plaintiff was entitled to damages stated that the matters were settled in a negative suit, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
