Find a Lawyer

HASAN ALI versus MUHAMMAD FARHAN AHMED

Section 15 DISCLAIMER APPLICATION There was no agreement between the parties regarding the non-payment of water and other allegations of premises destroyed by the tenant's tenant pledge that payment of such compensation was made. The tenant cannot plead against a particular provision of the law, but he will lie to the tenant to prove that he is not liable to pay such charges, but his mere words regarding the effect Will not be enough to remove the burden.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• JANAN alias JANO CHANDIO v. State 2009 PLD 265
• COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, MODEL CUSTOMS COLLECTORATE OF PACCS, KARACHI v. MUZAMMIL AHMAD 2009 PTD 266
• ALMAS KHAN v. Mrs. BANO 2009 PLD 268
• GHULAM HUSSAIN v. COURT OF VTH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KARACHI SOUTH 2009 CLC 272
• WASIM alias DON v. State 2009 PCrLJ 273
• SAJID KHAN v. State 2009 YLR 274
• NASIR BHOLOO v. KARACHI METROPOLITAN CORPORATION through Administrator 2009 MLD 274
• HAKIM ALI v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary 2009 PLD 278

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

famous lower court advocate from Turbat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes