Find a Lawyer

COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, MODEL CUSTOMS COLLECTORATE OF PACCS, KARACHI versus MUZAMMIL AHMAD

Section 194C (3A) Procedure for Interpretation of Appellate Tribunal of Section 194C (3A) Customs Act, 1969, clause clause, legislative intent in subsection (3A) of section 194C, Customs Act, 1969 That is, if a special bench consisting of two or more technical members could not hear any issue on the question of law, then it would be illogical and absurd to conclude that the legislature intended that the sitting technical member alone Can hear a case related to a question of law. In an explanation

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• Mst. SHAHZADI v. SAIFULLAH BUGHIO, S.H.O. KETI MUMTAZ, LARKANA 2009 PLD 263
• Dr. NASAR ULLAH v. ABDUL MAJEED SOOMRO 2009 PLC(CS) 263
• M.Y. CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, L.U. Deptt. 2009 YLR 263
• JANAN alias JANO CHANDIO v. State 2009 PLD 265
• ALMAS KHAN v. Mrs. BANO 2009 PLD 268
• GHULAM HUSSAIN v. COURT OF VTH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KARACHI SOUTH 2009 CLC 272
• HASAN ALI v. MUHAMMAD FARHAN AHMED 2009 PLD 273
• WASIM alias DON v. State 2009 PCrLJ 273

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

pakistani advocates Mir Ali lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes