Article 5, Schedule Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The Constitutional application for dissolution of marriage by the plaintiff against the plaintiff was upheld by the Family Court and the marriage was withdrawn from the sale of gold, jewelry and abandonment. Was conditional The appellate court upheld the family court's decision, saying that the plaintiff's hater of the plaintiff deserves to be dissolved on the basis of her marriage decision. His face was bad in law by the appellate court and his correction was needed to maintain the interests of the parties; questions related to the recovery of benefits by the wife to dissolve the marriage by the Khulna and his return. The family court was also required to make a decision by the Family Court or, the appellate court could not refuse to decide such questions on the pretext. axt which did not depend on the return of the decree for the dissolution of the marriage on the basis of the oath, if it was found that the wife was obliged to return some of the benefits received, she would be ordered to return it and In the event of their absence, the payment of the decree passed by the Family Court or the Appellate Court will be treated in the same manner as the benefits of marriage approved by them for other civil liabilities such as Dover, Dowry, Care, etc. The family court's finding on the return of the family was challenged before the appellate court by a wife considering Khola, though Kh The injunction for the will was not presented to the appellate court, instead the question of the liability of the plaintiff regarding the receipt of the concession and its return
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
