Find a Lawyer

NASEEM AHMED versus MST. ZUBAIDA KHATOON

Section 17 (2) (iv) and (4) (b) Grounds for demolition and reconstruction of the house for personal use and occupation of evacuation application, Proof Landlady approved by the competent authority of the Cantonment Board at the court's direction Presented a reconstructed project. The premises were demolished after it was taken over by other tenants through court proceedings, and the condition of the disputed shop was not good. The rent law never intended that landlords own property improvements. Had the right to improve the property and increase the utility of his property. Due to poor condition, the previous rent case was withdrawn in view of fresh land rebuilding the premises because Landlady had acquired four of her properties under section 17 (vii) of the Cantonment Rent Restriction Act, 1963. Failure to break premises within months can be punished. Accepted under the circumstances

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• OFSPACE PRIVATE LIMITED v. SAGHIR AHMED QURESHI 2009 YLR 2352
• NOOR MUHAMMAD v. FAZAL MAHMOOD 2009 YLR 2359
• BANTVA MEMON KHIDMAT COMMITTEE v. CHAIRMAN AL-HILAL CHS LTD. 2009 YLR 2374
• SHAHZADO SHAH v. Mst. ANEELA 2009 YLR 2399
• SHER KHAN v. THE STATE through A.A.-G. 2009 YLR 2407
• Dr. MUHAMMAD FAROOQUE MEMON v. DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER/PRESIDENT DISTRICT RED CRESCENT BRANCH, HYDERABAD 2009 YLR 2414
• ANWAR ALI v. S.I.O., P.S. WARISDINO MACHHI, LARKANA 2009 YLR 2420
• ABDUL SATTAR v. State 2009 YLR 2435

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

advocates from Tarnol lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes