A. XXXVIII, R 5 Partnership Act (IX of 1932), Sections 40 and 48 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 54 and for attachment before dissolution of account, restitution of account, damages, mandatory and permanent injunction The petitioner, in his application, had sought attachment in connection with the construction of the road project before the decision of the defendant to run and final bills to be filed under O XXXVII, R 5, CPC for attachment before the judgment. Necessarily, it was satisfied by oath or otherwise, that the defendants intended to delay or delay the execution of an injunction , Which could be granted against him, was to dispose of or completely remove the whole or any part of his property. Or it was unusual for the defendant to file a counter-affidavit with no part of the property within the local jurisdiction of the court and the court would not impose any restriction on it. Issue an order for the defendant not to file a counter-affidavit, unless, on the contrary, he is satisfied that the defendant had filed a pre-judgment affidavit under Attachment under A-XXXVIII, CPC R5 Although the affidavit in its accompanying affidavit stated that the defendant had begun to intensify his construction due to concerns of China and after collecting the moving bills, The country was about to leave, but did not pray for the money order against the defendant, neither was the claimant in the claim clause. Required a decree of any sum against the defendant and, precisely because the plaintiff and the defendant
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
