PEER MUKARRAM-UL-HAQ versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
48 (1), 189, 190 and 212 (3) of the Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), removal of section 23 Civil Servants (Appeals) Rules, 1977, R5 Service (Special Powers) Ordinance (XVII of 2000), Article (1) (a) [since repealed] It is the constitutional duty of the President of Pakistan to ensure the implementation of the decision of the Supreme Court to prevent the employment of public servants from reaching the final after the decision of the President of the Supreme Court. Depending on the strictness of section 23 of the Civil Servants Act 1973, the president dismissed employees on grounds of unlawful absence from duty; government employees were charged with unauthorized absence of duty. Dismissed from employment - In front of the Servants Act, 1973, before the President (authorized authority), which remained controversial, the civil servant filed an appeal before the service tribunal, which was granted, however, in his application by the Supreme Court. Elite jurisdiction upholds employment dismissal Supreme Court decision finalized Was granted, and the civil servant was again restored to service, such an order of the President was given under Article 212 (3) of the Constitution It was a violation of the Supreme Court's decision, whereby such an order was upheld by the President to punish him for his termination of employment. ) Upset Article 190 of the Constitution, which mandates that all administrative and judicial authorities work with the help of the Supreme Court Government employees to dismiss them under R5 of the Public Employees (Appeal) Rules. Has obtained the right to appeal against. , 1977 Government Employees (Correction
