Find a Lawyer

COOPER & CO. (PVT.) LTD versus LAUREL NAVIGATION (MAURITIUS) LTD

Sections 12, 42 and 54 of the Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 202 Agent for the specific performance of the shipping agency contract, injunction and damages to be involved in heavy costs by the agent and to carry out the agency's business The provisional injunction to prevent the termination of the agency by principal justification for the necessary infrastructure cannot be due to the commission's interest or the agent's interest in such agency; the order of such expenditure by the agent guarantees a collateral. Not because the agent claimed damages. Compensation in alternative relief money will generally be considered appropriate remedy for illegal termination of the agency Temporarily the application for an injunction was dismissed in circumstances

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• Mst. MEHJABEEN v. D.P.O. 2009 PCrLJ 173
• Syed NASIR HUSSAIN SHAH v. ZILA NAIB NAZIM, DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, SUKKUR 2009 MLD 174
• Mst. SAEEDA KHATOON v. Haji ZANGI KHAN 2009 YLR 175
• MUHAMMAD YAKOOB v. Mst. ZAIBUNNISA 2009 CLC 177
• GULAB DAHRI v. State 2009 YLR 181
• Dr. MARVI SHAH v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary 2009 PLC(CS) 182
• Mian SHIRAZ ARSHAD v. Mst. TAZEEN ARIF ALI KHAN 2009 PLD 183
• SHAUKAT ALI alias LALOO v. State 2009 YLR 184

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

criminal advocate from Malakand lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes