Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YAKOOB versus MST. ZAIBUNNISA

Sections 15 and 16 (2) of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application Decision to delay the removal of tenants sufficiently reason the tenant temporarily failed to comply with the rent order So his defense was dismissed and he was sacked. The appeal filed by the tenant was approved by the tenant, which was rejected by the appellate court, because it was banned with restriction. The fair principles of justice and fair play cannot help those who were extraordinarily negligent in their acknowledgment of their rights and, despite being aware of the alleged false order. His interest lay in deep sleep, as he had to explain every day that the tenant had to establish that it was not possible to appear and to appear and show up at a fixed time for a particular purpose. Was out of control. As long as there was a `` reasonable cause '' or cause for which he failed to appear in a competent court at any particular time, the negligence by the tenant cannot be transferred to the other side of the tenant. There was no warning in the series and he had to suffer and no one could be held responsible in this matter and every matter had to be decided by himself. Goods and delays of one day may not be respected. The tenant cannot request constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court as it did not identify any illegal or lawful violation as appropriate. And because of the legality, the order of eviction by the two courts was not required. Interference and High Court Rules power of attorney advocate Ugoki lawyer