Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SIND ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION versus JAFFAR ALI


Sections 137 and 138 read with Civil Code of Conduct (V8 1908), VI VIII r 2 Do not inspect the victim's father on the question about the age of the victim's mother. If the judge had, he could justify the age given to him as being drunk.

1981 C L C 1166

[Karachi]

Before Ajmal Mian and Z. C. Valliani, JJ

SIND ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION‑Appellant

versus

JAFFAR Ali AND 3 others---‑Respondents

High Court Appeal No. 31 of 1981, decided on 4th May, 1981.

(a) Fatal Accidents Act (XIII of 1855)‑-----

------S. 1‑‑Fatal accident‑Contributory negligence‑Bus driven in rash careless and negligent manner dashing from behind against bicycle ridden by deceased and his companion‑Held, mere fact of deceased having been sitting on cycle frame and not driving himself would not disentitle deceased's parents to maintain suit.

(b) Fatal Accidents Act (XIII of 1855)‑-----

--------Ss. 1 & 3‑Damages‑‑‑Computation‑Held, Court has discretion to compute amount of damages on basis of life expectancy of parents (claimants).‑.[Damages].

(c) Fatal Accidents Act (XIII of 1855)‑----

‑‑‑ S. 1‑Damages‑Computation‑Deceased aged 14 years and study ing in Class VII at time of accident‑Single Judge deducting estimated amount of expenditure on deceased's education from assessed quantum of damages‑‑Held, in such case calculation of damages has to be made on guesswork and not on actual facts and in circumstances, basis of calculation as adopted reasonable.‑[Damages].

Sri Manmatha Nath Nuri v. Moulvi Mukhleaur Rthman P L D 1969 S C 565 ref.

(d) Evidence Act (I of 1872)‑---

------Ss. 137 & 138 read with Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. VIII r. 2‑‑Absence of cross‑examination and plea‑Appellants not cross‑examining deceased's father on question of age of deceased's mother‑No plea raised in written statement questioning age of deceas ed's mother‑Plaint being verified on oath Single Judge, held, could presume age given in title of plaint as correct.‑{Plaint].

M.O. Dastgir for Appellant.

Date of hearing: 4th May, 1981.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of advocates from Wah Cantt lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.