Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MOBAMMADI RE-ROLLING MILLS LTD., KARACHI versus AHMEDI BANO


In the absence of section 13 (6) the appellant and his lawyer, in order to control the rent payment, the fixed persons are directed to submit the rent arrears before the due date but the appellants do not collect the rent and the appellant. The rent controller banning the defense has challenged on a tenant basis. His lawyer was out of the station when the rent submission order was approved, and the lawyer who knew about the inspection of the file at a later date will have grounds for trial, rarely a case, and a prosecution. If enough, the overall example is not supported by the record to avoid reckless tenant's serious and bed-related illness.

1981 C L C 1160

[Karachi]

Before Saeeduzzaman Siddiqui, J

MOHAMMADI RE‑ROLLING MILLS LTD., KARACHI

AND another---Appellants

Versus

Mst. AHMEDI BANO‑‑Respondent

Second Appeal No. 141 of 1978, decided on 26th April, 1980.

(a) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)---

------S. 13(6)‑Default in payment of rent‑Rent Controller in absence of appellants and their counsel directing appellants to deposit arrears of rent before a specified date but appellants not depositing rent and Rent Controller striking off defence of appellants‑Order challenged on grounds of tenant and his counsel having been out of station when order for deposit of rent passed and counsel coming to know of such order on inspection of file at a later date‑Grounds in circum. stances of case, held hardly sufficient to condone default and case, an example of gross negligence‑Contention of serious and bed‑riddening sickness of tenant being unsupported by record also held not accept able.

Hashim Khan v. Ghulam Nabi 1971 S C M R 112 ; Saeedan Bibi v. Ali Hussain 1975 S C M R 261; Mat. Bachi Bai v. Ghulam Abbas P L D 1972 Kar. 278 and Jalal Din v. Azizuddin P L D 1963 Lah. 436 ref.

(b) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑-------

--------S. 13(6)‑Default. in payment of rent‑Waiver‑Estoppel‑Appellants paying arrears of rent and current rent to respondent in Court during pendency of first appeal as condition for grant of stay in appeal‑Such payment, held, has no bearing on default already committed‑Acceptance of arrears of rent and current rent by respon dent in circumstances, further held, cannot give rise to waiver or estoppel against,, respondent‑Evidence Act (I of 1872), S. 115. [Waiver‑Estoppe].

Z. C. Valliani for Appellants.

G. H:‑Malik for Respondent.

Dates of hearing : 19th and 26th April, 1980.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous lower court advocate from Haveli Lakha lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.