EXIDE PAKISTAN LTD. THROUGH FINANCE DIRECTOR AND COMPANY SECRETARY versus MALIK ABDUL WADOOD
Section 44 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), O XXXIX, Rr. 1 and 2 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 16 (3) prohibits a competitor from joining another organization for two years in the business with the plaintiff's request. For the plaintiff's temporary injunction against the plaintiff for a permanent injunction, the request was that the defendant joined the plaintiff's company in 1971 and resigned from the job on 4 12 2007. That such a pledge was in the Plaintiff's letter dated 12th 2001, telling the defendant about his salary increase. That the plaintiff found out in the third week of May 2008 that the defendant had joined an organization that competed in business with the plaintiff. It was held that the binding covenant was a forgery question, even if the defendant accepted the ban, only it could be decided. After the recording of the evidence, no change in the terms and conditions of loss of service of the employees can be made without his consent and in view of such change after 35 years of service, the principle of equality should be taken into account. Yes, nothing was available on the record. To show that the plaintiff had issued a letter containing all such obligations to all of its employees and that the ban agreement was accepted by them, if appropriate, for the time and place where the employee was involved in the activity. If not told to be, the court may provide relief to the halt. The same cannot be said about the breach of the test representative's 35 years of service as a sales representative. Confidential information about the quality control produced and produced by the plaintiff, such letter
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
