Section 66 / / 66 / AA A, B, E / & 67 and A 70 Criminal Code of Conduct (VV 1818), Section 616161 Termination of Application for Complaint. Who was the company representative, he filed an FIR that his company is producing a filter on the brand name of the scheme and the owner of the applicant company is doing business of selling fake product in the name of his (complainant) company. Filed a case against the applicant under Sections 5/66/66 A, B, E / 67 and 70A of the Copyright Ordinance, 1962, under Section 249A, CCPC in the Judicial Magistrate's Court. The petition moved on the basis that the police had no jurisdiction. In this case, when the FTA had obtained exclusive jurisdiction to deal with the case, the magistrate rejected the application; the applicant, who could not succeed in the trial, had the jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 561A. Had been requested by the PR Standing Council, with the PTA under the Copyright Ordinance, 1962, and the confession made by the police was illegal and beyond their jurisdiction He also denied the suggestion. o Without touching on the merits of the legality of the case and without prejudice to the rights of the complainant to the appropriate jurisdiction, the High Court held that the observation taken by the police was without jurisdiction. And the action initiated by the police with no jurisdiction was abolished. Opening to open civil proceedings for accused / applicants for claims of damages against police officers
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
