MST. KHADIJA DAWOOD versus 1ST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, (KARACHI) EAST
Section 15 (2) (ii) of the Contract Act (IX of 1872), for the tenant to retain the eviction petition, challenged that the bank had made a claim against it, but two options as support. Was not cooperated with 's lawyer. The signing of the Power of Attorney himself had shown that he could only work with another lawyer and not under his sole capacity to enter the rent controller of the bank with the signatures of two persons. Earlier, his Extinction Execution request was confirmed by one of them. The person, who appeared as a bank lawyer and witness, was examined and admitted that the bank had no resolution while the attorney was effective with another lawyer's association because the two lawyers worked collaboratively. Had to do, the case has been pending since the last 12. Year, but no objection was raised by the bank to the prosecution of its officers / lawyers. In such a situation, even if there was a defect in the power of attorney's offer at the relevant time, section 196 of the Contract Act 1872 could also be granted. Who provided that the person acting on behalf of an agent or lawyer can then ratify the act of the principal lawyer or agent, irrespective of any impairment in power.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
