SYED WAJAHAT HUSSAIN ZAIDI versus T.J. IBRAHIM & CO. THROUGH OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE
Section 10 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 intra-court appeal property auctioneer's improvement was the highest bidder but government assignment improved the bid, which was taken up by appellant the next day. In the process, the government took such action. Assignee was unlawful because he was admitted behind his back. Appellant's signature on the correctional memo looked different from his signature on the appellant's initial offer and supported the intra-court appeal affidavit. With the signatures and the appellant's lawyer, this fact raised doubts. In the mind of the Division Bench of the High Court, if the assessee had examined the signatures of the improvement memo, the dispute would not have arisen, such an aspect of the matter would have been avoided by the notice of the High Court Company Judge, while the petition filed by the appellant. Removing money will be excluded. The auction received on the sale of the property was to be distributed so that the affected persons, in the interest of all concerned, the Division Bench of the High Court set aside the order passed by the High Court Company Judge and to improve the bid. The High Court Division Bench directed the official to call the parties again for the improvement of the bid as the appellant expressed his desire to improve his bid. Was
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
